English version:

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

“THE STUDIO IS BETWEEN PEOPLE”

Interview Johannes Wiek with David Hornemann v. Laer

On May 12, 2021, it will be 100 years since Joseph Beuys was born in Krefeld. Many of the things for which the activist for democracy and ecology, the do-gooder and co-founder of the Green Party gave impetus still seem relevant today, which is why it is worth taking a look at his work. We asked David Hornemann von Laer what is the most important thing that Beuys brought to the world of thought and society in terms of our topic networking and connection.

Explain to us what Beuys means by “The studio is between people.”
Beuys formulated this during a panel discussion with author Michael Ende on the topic of “art and politics” in February 1985. It expresses the fact that artistic activity also takes place in interpersonal relationships and no longer just in the seclusion of a studio. It also means that creativity no longer takes place only in secret, but begins to play a role in interpersonal relationships. This results in new connections and points of contact with art. Just one example: even something as remote from art as a city council was inspired by the project “Stadtverwaldung statt Stadtverwaltung” (City Forestation instead of City Council) in Kassel to get involved in something new and to find creative solutions for the planting and setting of 7,000 oak trees and associated stone steles. But this also frightened people like the then science minister and later German president Johannes Rau, from whom the words have been handed down: “I cannot and must not allow myself to be made into a possible art object. “3 Beuys has thus repeatedly allowed art to take place where we would least expect it. In this way, new connections and possibilities for connection arose again and again.

How did Beuys go about it?
For Beuys, all social and societal questions were essentially design questions and thus artistic challenges that concern every human being, but for which every human being can also find solutions. By starting with the concept of art and expanding and totalizing it to include all of human life, he succeeded in opening up entirely new levels and connections for art. Beuys not only incorporated new materials such as felt and grease into his art, but also shaped the relationship to animals, to plants, to nature, and showed how man can enter into a relationship with angels and spirits. For him, man was only “a ground station for something much greater,” and works of art were “ground stations that release something from themselves that has a metaphysical, spiritual character.”

I regard Beuys as a consequence of art history. He has made the
theme of what individual artists* have drawn from over the
millennia: creativity itself.“

David Hornemann von Laer

Consequently, what position does Beuys hold in art history?
I see Beuys as a consequence of art history. He has taken as his theme that from which individual artists have drawn over the millennia: creativity itself. In Beuys, art in a certain sense comes into its own, becomes aware of itself in the work of this artist. It becomes human. This has far-reaching consequences, because when life becomes art, when every action, every word, every deed can potentially become an artistic act, we can no longer talk ourselves out of it, but see ourselves challenged to do everything we do artistically, that is, more precisely, more concretely, more vividly, more consciously.

How did you first come into contact with it? When did it “grab” you?
I first heard about Beuys in my early childhood, when cleaning staff accidentally cleaned a work by Beuys – an old bathtub – to use it for rinsing glasses. This, of course, made big waves and led me to become interested in this person and his art. The golden “Peace Bunny” was on display in the State Gallery, and I was fascinated by the story of how it came to be, since it had been cast by Beuys by remelting a copy of Ivan the Terrible’s tsarist crown as part of his 7000 Oaks campaign.

Finally, back to the question on the topic of our issue: To what extent do you see Beuys as a networker?
Beuys is the prototype of a networker. He not only worked with a wide variety of people (from politics, banking, business, public administration, the churches and others) and in his call for an alternative of December 23, 19786 tried to address “all people of the European cultural and civilization circle,” but through his actions also established a comprehensive network with the animal and environmental worlds, philosophy and religion, science and, last but not least, with the art scene, which is still unparalleled in its diversity today.

What can we still learn from Beuys today?
Beuys was, after all, famously “in search of the stupidest” and asked himself, “Where would I have got to if I had been intelligent?” This is contrary to what we strive for today, where everything is supposed to be “smart” and as efficient as possible. But when we look more closely, it is often the detours, the connections that are useless at first glance, that give us new ideas and involve us in processes that make innovative action possible. Beuys teaches me – perhaps it is the same for others – how a magic can spread over life when we experience how, through our own artistic endeavors, everything mundane, merely aimed at purposes, at making money, at performance, can be transformed into something playful that brings joy, that brings us together, and that allows artistic things to emerge between us and the diversity of relationships between us and the world to become visible.

JOSPEPH BEUYS AS A NETWORKER

1

2

3

4

5

6

Panel discussion with author Michael Ende on the topic „Kunst und Politik“ in February 1985:
youtube.com/watch?v=FBj93f4azCc

Hans Eichel: „Eine geniale Provokation“. In: 7000 Eichen
7000eichen.de/?id=23

Petra Kipphoff : „Der Fall Joseph Beuys: Mancherlei Recht“. In: DIE ZEIT (27. Oktober 1972)
zeit.de/1972/43/mancherlei-recht

Burkhard Reinartz: „Joseph Beuys und die Religion. Auferstehen muss der Mensch schon selbst“. In: Deutschlandfunk (25.12.2019)
deutschlandfunk.de/joseph-beuys-und-die-religion-auferstehen-muss-der-mensch.886.de.html?dram:article_id=466086

Joseph Beuys, Friedenshase, 1982Gold, Edelsteine, Perlen, Schlacke, Stahl-Safe mit Panzerglas, 33,5 x 33,5 x 10,5 cm, Staatsgalerie Stuttgart
staatsgalerie.de/g/sammlung/sammlung-digital/einzelansicht/sgs/werk/einzelansicht/68A7B615417ECFE3E23F1299840BC9B5.html

Joseph Beuys: „Aufruf zur Alternative“. In: Frankfurter Rundschau (23. Dezember 1978)
post.thing.net/node/24447

DAVID HORNEMANN VON LAER

Dr. David Hornemann von Laer, art scholar and educational researcher, has been involved with Joseph Beuys and his work for many years in the context of articles, seminars, excursions. Doctorate on the Sistine ceiling frescoes with Prof. Michael Bockemühl at the Faculty for Cultural Reflection of the UW/H. Initiator and editor of the book series “Seeing Art”, in which the public lectures of Professor Bockemühl, together with students are published.

David Hornemann von Laer creates connections between people by collectively making them perceive both artworks and the world around us very differently than we are used to. Through his work, he also keeps alive the connection to one of the founders of Studium fundamentale – Prof. Michael Bockemühl.

SEEING ART – BEUYS

Michael Bockemühl did not want to know, but to see how Joseph Beuys, who kept the whole art business in suspense for a while, proceeded in his works and actions. That’s why he starts with the artist’s quiet, small, almost casual works, and from here he opens up the potential of his art, “which has not yet been evaluated at all and has a whole new coloration, will take on a new character if you look at it more closely…”.

6

info3-verlag.de/kunst-sehen/#bestellung

The latest volume on Joseph Beuys is published at the same time as our issue, under the guiding question: IS NOT EVERYTHING ALREADY SAID ABOUT BEUYS?